Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:Number Two/Archive 1

Discussion page of Number Two/Archive 1
Revision as of 13:42, 15 April 2008 by Ausir (talk | contribs)

Latest comment: 16 years ago by Ausir in topic Leoben / Number Two

Leoben / Number Two

This warrants an own article, just as there are various articles for the different Sixes. The main Leoben Conoy is a very specific character with a distinct history, whereas Number Two is an introduction and lists various other appearances. It's really the same as with Six. We don't have one article there either. -- Serenity 13:03, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

I agree that "Kara's Leoben" deserves a separate article, but disagree with the current division of the articles into "Number Two" and "Leoben Conoy". Prior to "Six of One" all' copies of Two are referred to as "Leobens" by both Cylons and humans. And we don't have separate D'Anna Biers/Number Three articles either.
In conclusion, I think the Leoben and Number Two articles should be merged, with only "Virtual Leoben" and maybe "Gemenon Traveler/New Caprica Leoben" as separate articles (although I'm not sure of what the name for his article should be, so I'd still leave him here). Having the Ragnar copy together with the Gemenon Traveler/New Caprica copy (assuming they're the same) in one article is like merging the Armistice Station copy of Six into the Caprica Six article. It's possible that they're the same, but it's highly conjectural. Ausir 13:10, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
Well, that's a problem with this whole number crap, which is annoying to begin with. It's mostly a matter of definition. The Colonials, just like we, use the assumed name for all models only because they/we don't know the number. So earlier articles probably refer to them like "a Leoben model" or something like that. But it's not really worth it to go back and correct everything in all previous articles. However, I'd definitely say that the Starbuck Leoben is the Leoben, while the other models are more like a Leoben. Now we would call the "Number Two" in a general way. So for me, the separation fits as it is.
You may have a point about the Ragnar Anchorage copy though :) We could move that into the main article. -- Serenity 13:21, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
The Starbuck Leoben is the Leoben, but he's probably not the same as the Ragnar copy, unless he somehow managed to board the Gemenon Traveler after being rescued from Ragnar by other Cylons. So there's no reason for him being in the same article as Kara's Leoben instead of in the general article for the model (similarly to the Armistice Six). And the problem with having Kara's Leoben at Leoben Conoy is that, unlike Caprica Six or Sharon Valerii, this name was used for all copies of this model, starting with the Ragnar one. How about making up a descriptive term for Starbuck's (non-virtual) Leoben? Ausir 13:24, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
I moved the Anchorage copy back to the main article. And while sometimes the name Leoben has been used for the entire model, that particular copy is really the main copy in the series. So when saying "Leoben Conoy" without any modifier, it can usually be assumed that the Kara Thrace one is meant.
Well, in the context of the miniseries (and really, pretty much all the way until season 3), "Leoben" means the whole "Number Two" model. Ausir 13:42, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply