I bet you 50 cubits that this fellow is a Cylon. --Volostheguardian 23:15, 9 December 2006 (CST)
- I certainly hope he isn't. --Sauron18 23:56, 9 December 2006 (CST)
- Cylon or not he'll most likely be a "baddie", cus the actor always is. lol --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 06:49, 10 December 2006 (CST)
- Actually it's Romo Lampkin.
- http://www.sidesexpress.com/se_index.cfm?locid=5&task=type&l=5&c=battlestar#sr
- --Deus 07:00, 10 December 2006 (CST)
- Yeah, I was only about 90% certain about the exact pronunciation of his name when I listened to the podcast. That's why I didn't feel I should create this page and only posted it on The Son Also Rises--Straycat0 10:39, 10 December 2006 (CST)
- Cylon or not he'll most likely be a "baddie", cus the actor always is. lol --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 06:49, 10 December 2006 (CST)
- Sauron18... a "lawyer" would be a perfect fit for a Cylon. Shane (T - C - E) 18:24, 6 January 2007 (CST)
- Well, does he look like any of these guys? Anyway, it's certainly not a bet I'd take! Though I think it would be cooler if, as a force of evil, he was human but somehow in cahoots with the Cylons, rather like Morden from Babylon 5. --Saforrest 19:57, 26 February 2007 (CST)
- Please please please ignore what the final five look like in that picture! They are only standins used for the promotional image and are never seen on screen. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:53, 27 February 2007 (CST)
- My apologies. I knew those five were only stand-ins; I should have qualified that so as not to lead anyone astray. --Saforrest 08:32, 5 March 2007 (CST)
- Please please please ignore what the final five look like in that picture! They are only standins used for the promotional image and are never seen on screen. --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 03:53, 27 February 2007 (CST)
Hey, page authors: spoilers from hidden fields on this page are showing up in Google right now! If you Google "Romo Lampkin" you'll see them, even though they're not visible on this page. And Google searches don't have spoiler warnings so guys, maybe you should get rid of those hidden fields altogether and wait till the facts have been revealed? I've already been spoiled now myself but I'm not mad. I'm not removing the fields because it's really up to you. But I thought you should be aware. --njgreen 06:45, 12 March 2007 (EST)