Podcast talk:Torn: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Podcast:Torn
More actions
Style question |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) →Transcript Conventions: + answer |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Transcript Conventions == | == Transcript Conventions == | ||
There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST) | There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --[[User:PrePressChris|PrePressChris]] 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST) | ||
:The former is what I usually do. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:26, 1 December 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 18:26, 1 December 2006
Cornell Student Copyright
I left the Cornell class off the copyright since I couldn't think of any meaningful way of uniquely attributing them. Should I add something about them in the header copyright or just leave them off? --Steelviper 11:25, 8 November 2006 (CST)
Transcript Conventions
There's a couple points in Act 1 where RDM mentions "Exodus" but doesn't specify whether he means Part 1 or Part 2, although it's clear from context. Should the part number be added in the link only, or should it be expanded in the transcript as if he had actually said, e.g., "Exodus:Part 1"? My instinct is for the former. --PrePressChris 11:32, 29 November 2006 (CST)
- The former is what I usually do. --Steelviper 12:26, 1 December 2006 (CST)