Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for November 2006: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) (+comment) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've made it my mission to get a silly page as featured article. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:43, 16 October 2006 (CDT) | I've made it my mission to get a silly page as featured article. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 08:43, 16 October 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I love the silly pages, and will defend their right to exist to the death, but I don't think they're appropriate for a featured article. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:16, 30 October 2006 (CST) | :I love the silly pages, and will defend their right to exist to the death, but I don't think they're appropriate for a featured article. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 18:16, 30 October 2006 (CST) | ||
:I have to concur with Peter, although Toaster is arguably our most humorous article. It seems more appropriate to have our encyclopedic articles stand out. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 08:17, 31 October 2006 (CST) |
Revision as of 14:17, 31 October 2006
I've made it my mission to get a silly page as featured article. --BklynBruzer 08:43, 16 October 2006 (CDT)
- I love the silly pages, and will defend their right to exist to the death, but I don't think they're appropriate for a featured article. --Peter Farago 18:16, 30 October 2006 (CST)
- I have to concur with Peter, although Toaster is arguably our most humorous article. It seems more appropriate to have our encyclopedic articles stand out. --Spencerian 08:17, 31 October 2006 (CST)