Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Errors Policy: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:21, 15 September 2006

Since the draft's not finished, I'll go by what I've see so far:

Basically, I am in full agreement that Battlestar Wiki should avoid fanwanking -- which is just another manifestation of fanon's ugly head anyway and Battlestar Wiki doesn't support fan fiction in its primary articles, other than our single entry pertaining to it. My primary concern is that while we should extend an assumption of good faith on the part of the cast and crew (which makes sense, since we do the same thing here to contributors), it is in how we would practice this. Does this mean ignoring errors that the crew create? If so, what kind of errors? Would the error be "small"? If so, how "small" is "small"? How "huge" is "huge"? -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 12:20, 15 September 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 17:20, 15 September 2006 view source Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk \| contribs) Senior Chiefs, Marines, Interface administrators, interwiki, Sponsors, CAP, Chiefs 63,113 edits reply		Revision as of 17:21, 15 September 2006 view source Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk \| contribs) Senior Chiefs, Marines, Interface administrators, interwiki, Sponsors, CAP, Chiefs 63,113 edits m fixing links Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Since the draft's not finished, I'll go by what I've see so far:		Since the draft's not finished, I'll go by what I've see so far:

	Basically, I am in full agreement that Battlestar Wiki should avoid fanwanking -- which is just another manifestation of [[fanon]]'s ugly head anyway and Battlestar Wiki doesn't support fan fiction in its primary articles, other than our [[fan ~~ficton~~\|single entry pertaining to it]]. My primary concern is that while we should extend an assumption of good faith on the part of the cast and crew (which makes sense, since we do the same thing here to contributors), it is in '''how''' we would practice this. Does this mean ignoring errors that the crew create? If so, what kind of errors? Would the error be "small"? If so, how "small" ''is'' "small"? How "huge" is "huge"? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 12:20, 15 September 2006 (CDT)		Basically, I am in full agreement that Battlestar Wiki should avoid fanwanking -- which is just another manifestation of [[w:fanon\|fanon]]'s ugly head anyway and Battlestar Wiki doesn't support fan fiction in its primary articles, other than our [[fan fiction\|single entry pertaining to it]]. My primary concern is that while we should extend an assumption of good faith on the part of the cast and crew (which makes sense, since we do the same thing here to contributors), it is in '''how''' we would practice this. Does this mean ignoring errors that the crew create? If so, what kind of errors? Would the error be "small"? If so, how "small" ''is'' "small"? How "huge" is "huge"? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 12:20, 15 September 2006 (CDT)