Template talk:RFA: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 13:00, 2 August 2006

Linkback

Is the linkback necessary? Once I got that bracket thing straightened out, it appears the subpage shows up right on the main RFA page. I think the "Vote here" link is supposed to point to the edit of the subpage, though. That way people are editing the subpage instead of the main page in order to vote. --Steelviper 14:28, 21 December 2005 (EST)

Just that, after editing a given nominate page, it's a lot of pressing back to get to the main RFA page. --Day 20:11, 21 December 2005 (EST)

Ending Time Update Auto Creation

I am working on this template to the time to "end" automatically. Shorting the code also to. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 16:32, 1 August 2006 (CDT)

This is now fully working. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 21:43, 1 August 2006 (CDT)

Could you briefly explain what you did? --Peter Farago 23:14, 1 August 2006 (CDT)

It looks like it automatically (automagically?) fills in the "RFA End" to be a week past the time of the RFA creation. Unfortunately, I believe that the RFA is supposed to run a week from the acceptance by the candidate (so that there is a full week for people to respond having read the responses and known that the candidate is interested in the position). I think that's a trickier problem to solve...--Steelviper 08:00, 2 August 2006 (CDT)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :This is now fully working. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 21:43, 1 August 2006 (CDT)
 ::Could you briefly explain what you did? --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:14, 1 August 2006 (CDT)
+:::It looks like it automatically (automagically?) fills in the "RFA End" to be a week past the time of the RFA creation. Unfortunately, I believe that the RFA is supposed to run a week from the acceptance by the candidate (so that there is a full week for people to respond having read the responses and known that the candidate is interested in the position). I think that's a trickier problem to solve...--[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 08:00, 2 August 2006 (CDT)