Talk:Miniseries, Analysis/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Miniseries, Analysis/Archive 1
More actions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:No. They didn't have surnames in the original. He wasn't "Apollo Adama" in the original, he was just "Apollo". --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 21:42, 3 July 2006 (CDT) | :No. They didn't have surnames in the original. He wasn't "Apollo Adama" in the original, he was just "Apollo". --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 21:42, 3 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
::But he would have been, techinically (though Apollo Adama sounds so stupid), wouldn't he? [[User:Luke|Luke]] 03:58, 4 July 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 08:58, 4 July 2006
As there were no objections to splitting this page, I have started to do it.
I suggest that any page that gets the 30k+ warning when editing should be split.
Hope eveyone approves. --Grafix 12:31, 15 March 2006 (CST)
'Adama is now a surname'. Hasn't it always been? I mean, Apollo (TOS) and Athena were Commander Adama's children in the original. Wouldn't that make Adama their surname? Luke 20:06, 3 July 2006 (CDT)
- No. They didn't have surnames in the original. He wasn't "Apollo Adama" in the original, he was just "Apollo". --The Merovingian (C - E) 21:42, 3 July 2006 (CDT)
- But he would have been, techinically (though Apollo Adama sounds so stupid), wouldn't he? Luke 03:58, 4 July 2006 (CDT)