Talk:Cylon History/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Cylon History/Archive 1
More actions
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:What we know from RDM is that the Cylons were built for heavy labor like mining and factories and such, and for warfare between the Colonies, they might have been sentient then that's what I think but it's not confirmed; this passage is phrased a bit "Romantically". --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 11:46, 1 July 2006 (CDT) | :What we know from RDM is that the Cylons were built for heavy labor like mining and factories and such, and for warfare between the Colonies, they might have been sentient then that's what I think but it's not confirmed; this passage is phrased a bit "Romantically". --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 11:46, 1 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
:: I think that if it was rephrased into NPOV it would probably be OK. --[[User:Gougef|FrankieG]] 12:54, 1 July 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:54, 1 July 2006
What is the Source on This?
"The humans of the Twelve Colonies reveled in their technology and used it not only for good, but for war between themselves. The Cylons, a group of machines designed for hard labor and warfare, were built. Over time, the humans specialized the design, giving the machines a form of artificial intelligence."
This text contains information which I don't believe we actually know, the whole humans-specializing-design into AI. Could someone please tell me what the source on that is? Otherwise I think it should be remove since it could become a case of misinformation. --Sauron18 02:04 01 July 2006 (CDT)
- What we know from RDM is that the Cylons were built for heavy labor like mining and factories and such, and for warfare between the Colonies, they might have been sentient then that's what I think but it's not confirmed; this passage is phrased a bit "Romantically". --The Merovingian (C - E) 11:46, 1 July 2006 (CDT)
- I think that if it was rephrased into NPOV it would probably be OK. --FrankieG 12:54, 1 July 2006 (CDT)