Talk:Glen A. Larson/Archive 1

For reasons discussed on Talk:Basestar (TOS), we cannot use GFDL content here. I am reverting the article. --Peter Farago 18:33, 9 January 2006 (EST)

My bad. I was apparently following bad precedent. Does that mean we should blank the Lorne Green article as well? I was sad at how small the Glen Larson article was, and was hoping for a quick fix. Edited to add this link to everything that uses that template (in case we need to erase those as well).--Steelviper 22:05, 9 January 2006 (EST)

Yes, we should. I'm sorry I missed that. Let's continue this discussion on Battlestar Wiki talk:Derivative Works--Peter Farago 23:01, 9 January 2006 (EST)

Cite

I didn't know that. That's why it should cited. Not all of have the book. The location should be put there if it's a direct source. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 23:27, 26 May 2006 (CDT)

I understand. I just wanted to rephrase it, because I'm trying to shy away from just copying stuff outright. --The Merovingian ^{(C - E)} 10:32, 27 May 2006 (CDT)

it should still be cited, even if it's paraphrased. Paraphrasing someones work even without citeing is still plagorism. --Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 23:42, 30 May 2006 (CDT)