Talk:Glen A. Larson/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Glen A. Larson/Archive 1
More actions
Cite |
|||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
I didn't know that. That's why it should cited. Not all of have the book. The location should be put there if it's a direct source. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 23:27, 26 May 2006 (CDT) | I didn't know that. That's why it should cited. Not all of have the book. The location should be put there if it's a direct source. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 23:27, 26 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
:I understand. I just wanted to rephrase it, because I'm trying to shy away from just copying stuff outright. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 10:32, 27 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 15:32, 27 May 2006
For reasons discussed on Talk:Basestar (TOS), we cannot use GFDL content here. I am reverting the article. --Peter Farago 18:33, 9 January 2006 (EST)
- My bad. I was apparently following bad precedent. Does that mean we should blank the Lorne Green article as well? I was sad at how small the Glen Larson article was, and was hoping for a quick fix. Edited to add this link to everything that uses that template (in case we need to erase those as well).--Steelviper 22:05, 9 January 2006 (EST)
- Yes, we should. I'm sorry I missed that. Let's continue this discussion on Battlestar Wiki talk:Derivative Works--Peter Farago 23:01, 9 January 2006 (EST)
Cite
I didn't know that. That's why it should cited. Not all of have the book. The location should be put there if it's a direct source. --Shane (T - C - E) 23:27, 26 May 2006 (CDT)
- I understand. I just wanted to rephrase it, because I'm trying to shy away from just copying stuff outright. --The Merovingian (C - E) 10:32, 27 May 2006 (CDT)