Talk:Caprica (series)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Caprica (series)/Archive 1
More actions
reply |
m add an indention level to my comment for clarity of target |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
#Is this for real? | #Is this for real? | ||
#If this is in the same continuity as the re-imagined series, we won't need a separate namespace for it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:51, 27 April 2006 (CDT) | #If this is in the same continuity as the re-imagined series, we won't need a separate namespace for it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:51, 27 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
:On the first, it looks it, but, like most people, I'm more inclined to believe things I like. | ::On the first, it looks it, but, like most people, I'm more inclined to believe things I like. | ||
:I almost posted the second on Quorum, but I decided it was a conclusion we'd all come to anyway. I'm glad I was at least partially right. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 01:56, 27 April 2006 (CDT) | ::I almost posted the second on Quorum, but I decided it was a conclusion we'd all come to anyway. I'm glad I was at least partially right. --[[User:CalculatinAvatar|CalculatinAvatar]] 01:56, 27 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 06:56, 27 April 2006
- Is this for real?
- If this is in the same continuity as the re-imagined series, we won't need a separate namespace for it. --Peter Farago 01:51, 27 April 2006 (CDT)
- On the first, it looks it, but, like most people, I'm more inclined to believe things I like.
- I almost posted the second on Quorum, but I decided it was a conclusion we'd all come to anyway. I'm glad I was at least partially right. --CalculatinAvatar 01:56, 27 April 2006 (CDT)