Talk:List of all episodes/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
More actions
Ernestborg9 (talk | contribs) m Season Two comments & question on validity of mini-series sub-article headings |
Ernestborg9 (talk | contribs) m Slight re-ordering of comments by heading to make referencing easier |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Season Two Comments== | |||
--[[User: | Sci-Fi just officially announced the second season of BSG has been confirmed, thank the Lords of Kobol! [[User:Kuralyov|Kuralyov]] 18:06, 9 Feb 2005 (EST) | ||
=== Frakin' A === | |||
About time they got off their business suited asses and did something right for a change. :-) --[[User:Joe.Beaudoin|Joe Beaudoin]] 19:34, 9 Feb 2005 (EST) | |||
Line 8: | Line 12: | ||
--[[User:Ernestborg9|Colonial Archivist]] 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST) | --[[User:Ernestborg9|Colonial Archivist]] 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST) | ||
== | ==Episode Guide Comments== | ||
Is there any reason for the sub-headings ("Part I" and "Part II") under the mini-series in the episode guide list? Given the excellent analysis Joe has put together (with ample opportunity for additions on notes, etc.), the sub-heading appear redundant - epecially when the mini hasn't '''necessarily''' been aired in two parts in all markets. Such a split could also cause irritation should information be split between the two sub-articles (given the need for people to page back and forth). IF such a split is needed - why not simply include the two parts as sub-headings '''within''' the main mini-series article? | |||
--[[User:Ernestborg9|Colonial Archivist]] 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST) |
Revision as of 09:34, 11 February 2005
Season Two Comments
Sci-Fi just officially announced the second season of BSG has been confirmed, thank the Lords of Kobol! Kuralyov 18:06, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)
Frakin' A
About time they got off their business suited asses and did something right for a change. :-) --Joe Beaudoin 19:34, 9 Feb 2005 (EST)
Season 2 was more-or-less on the cards: the UK ratings cambined with international interest shown via bulletin boards, etc., demonstrated Universal had a market for the show; all that was needed were initial US ratings (hence the announcement after only 5 episodes aired,rather than hanging-fire and taking stock after the majority of the season had aired), to confirm the US domestic market.
--Colonial Archivist 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)
Episode Guide Comments
Is there any reason for the sub-headings ("Part I" and "Part II") under the mini-series in the episode guide list? Given the excellent analysis Joe has put together (with ample opportunity for additions on notes, etc.), the sub-heading appear redundant - epecially when the mini hasn't necessarily been aired in two parts in all markets. Such a split could also cause irritation should information be split between the two sub-articles (given the need for people to page back and forth). IF such a split is needed - why not simply include the two parts as sub-headings within the main mini-series article?
--Colonial Archivist 04:30, 11 Feb 2005 (EST)