→Criteria for a Quality Article: grammar and style |
|||
Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
A quality article should have the following attributes: | A quality article should have the following attributes: | ||
*The article should be well-researched with [[Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad|proper citations of sources]]. | |||
*It needs to contain [[Canon|canonical]] information; [[non-canonical]] information should be avoided, unless it has a purpose such as to dispel a common misconception. | |||
*If the article contains POV content, it must be deemed insightful by a majority of the community. | |||
*The article must be properly copy-edited for grammar and style. See [[Battlestar Wiki:Standards and Conventions]]. | |||
The following '''do not''' qualify as Quality Article candidates: | The following '''do not''' qualify as Quality Article candidates: | ||
* [[Battlestar Wiki:Find or fix a stub|stubs]], | |||
* [[Battlestar Wiki:Find or fix a stub| | * talk pages, | ||
* | * anything in the Battlestar Wiki, Quotes, Sources, or User namespace, and | ||
* past, Current, or Future Featured articles that have been marked. | |||
* | |||
* | |||
== Identifying a Potential Quality Article == | == Identifying a Potential Quality Article == |
Revision as of 02:58, 26 April 2006
| |||||
Criteria for a Quality Article
| |||||
A quality article should have the following attributes:
- The article should be well-researched with proper citations of sources.
- It needs to contain canonical information; non-canonical information should be avoided, unless it has a purpose such as to dispel a common misconception.
- If the article contains POV content, it must be deemed insightful by a majority of the community.
- The article must be properly copy-edited for grammar and style. See Battlestar Wiki:Standards and Conventions.
The following do not qualify as Quality Article candidates:
- stubs,
- talk pages,
- anything in the Battlestar Wiki, Quotes, Sources, or User namespace, and
- past, Current, or Future Featured articles that have been marked.
Identifying a Potential Quality Article
Quality Articles should be identified as such, so that they may be listed in a master database.
Essentially, this would be done in the following way:
- A contributor tags an article page with {{quality candidate}}, then adds a note to the corresponding article's talk page explaining their reasoning.
- Invovled members of the community will then discuss the candidate article. Typically, they should be as critical as possible.
- If the consensus is that the article is of potential quality, then the discussion will evolve into modifying the article in such a way as to polish the article so as to achieve full "Quality Article" status.
- Once this is done, the article will be tagged {{quality article}}.
- If you an article could be a featured article on the front page, submit it first for a {{quality article}}.