Battlestar Wiki talk:Spoiler Policy: Difference between revisions
More actions
April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
|||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
===In favor of a policy against citing KR as a primary source=== | ===In favor of a policy against citing KR as a primary source=== | ||
#[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:34, 19 April 2006 (CDT) | #[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 23:34, 19 April 2006 (CDT) | ||
#[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 23:36, 19 April 2006 (CDT) - I feel like this guy betrayed us. And it's getting worse; 4-5 news sites report things he says as fact; he is not helping at all. | |||
===Opposed=== | ===Opposed=== | ||
Revision as of 04:36, 20 April 2006
Because of their length, the previous discussions on this page have been archived. If further archiving is needed, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page.
Previous discussions:
External Links
Links to Wikipedia using the Wikipedia: interwiki namespace still show up inside spoiltext. Example
| Spoiler follows, highlight to read. |
|---|
| Battlestar Galactica |
Fix: add this to the CSS:
td.spoiltext_box a.extiw {color: #000;}
--Peter Farago 18:29, 23 September 2005 (EDT)
"Spoiler Boxes"
- moved from Nelana Cain
The spoiler boxes have a serious flaw--you can't see the "this is a spoiler" line at the top when you're using the Monobook skin. It's too dark to read. I highlighted and ended up seeing the spoiler, and I didn't want to. Of course now I know what the box is and I won't highlight it anymore, but I would appreciate it if the box could be edited to be compatible with all the skins. Thanks. --Fang Aili 00:16, 24 September 2005 (EDT)
Koenigrules / Hollywood North Report
"Koenigrules" (KR) is the alias of a popular reporter of BSG spoilers, whose reports are often cited and reposted by other sources. Recent comments made on the "Subject 2 Discussion" segment of the "LV Rocks" radio program (transcribed at Sources:Precipice raised the possibility that KR is merely re-reporting publically available information, and does not appear to be a credible primary source.
The Merovingian investigated this possibility, and posted his findings to Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules. I raised the possibility of instating a policy against citing KR's reports as credible sources on Battlestar Wiki, which was seconded by CalculatinAvatar.
Consequently, I am opening a formal vote here on the matter. Please review Sources:Precipice, its putative source material, and The Merovingian's comments on Talk:Precipice#Question about Koenigrules prior to casting your vote, and feel free to raise any questions below.
In favor of a policy against citing KR as a primary source
- Peter Farago 23:34, 19 April 2006 (CDT)
- The Merovingian (C - E) 23:36, 19 April 2006 (CDT) - I feel like this guy betrayed us. And it's getting worse; 4-5 news sites report things he says as fact; he is not helping at all.