Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Talk:NBC/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of NBC/Archive 1
Aboris26 (talk | contribs)
Aboris26 (talk | contribs)
Line 10: Line 10:
No, it is not, for reasons I have cited above.  There is no move to NBC; I was there, I am a driving force on the messageboards; we all concluded that one buffoon who doesn't even watch Scifi Channel regularly started this rumor and is spread like telephone-game to a news website.  It has no basis in "fact" WHATSOEVER, and shall be removed ASAP.  I am sorry, I do not want to land on you hard about this and this is your first time here, but this is a sensitive matter and the handling you have given it here is quite irresponsible.  Please "lurk" around for a few days to get the flow of things around here and our Standards and Conventions. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 00:47, 19 March 2006 (CST)
No, it is not, for reasons I have cited above.  There is no move to NBC; I was there, I am a driving force on the messageboards; we all concluded that one buffoon who doesn't even watch Scifi Channel regularly started this rumor and is spread like telephone-game to a news website.  It has no basis in "fact" WHATSOEVER, and shall be removed ASAP.  I am sorry, I do not want to land on you hard about this and this is your first time here, but this is a sensitive matter and the handling you have given it here is quite irresponsible.  Please "lurk" around for a few days to get the flow of things around here and our Standards and Conventions. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] 00:47, 19 March 2006 (CST)


I apologize for the nature of this post, and I now more fully understand both the source of the rumors and the nature of the Standards and Conventions. I will remove this article as soon as you reply to this response and place it in the 'blogosphere', an understandably more appropriate location for an article of this nature. I do understand that there are ZERO facts behind a possible move, however, its possibility has to be discussed by Battlestar Galactica fans. As you can see, I have attempted to improve the accuracy of serveral other articles. I have included possibilities of relsoultions to uncertain topics which may be consider speculation in the past, but I felt these were appropriate topics to be included in the articles. In the future I will attempt not advoid crossing the line between expansion of article and sepculation.
I apologize for the nature of this post, and I now more fully understand both the source of the rumors and the nature of the Standards and Conventions. I will remove this article as soon as you reply to this response and place it in the 'blogosphere', an understandably more appropriate location for an article of this nature. I do understand that there are ZERO facts behind a possible move, however, its possibility has to be discussed by Battlestar Galactica fans. As you can see, I have attempted to improve the accuracy of serveral other articles. I have included possibilities of relsoultions to uncertain topics which may be consider speculation in the past, but I felt these were appropriate topics to be included in the articles. In the future I will attempt not advoid crossing the line between expansion of article and sepculation. Please see the new location of the article on this [http://semireg.blogspot.com/2006/03/battlestar-galactica-season-3-on-nbc.html blog].

Revision as of 07:00, 19 March 2006

Delete. This has nothing to do with Battlestar and Gossip should not be placed here. --Shane (C - E) 00:35, 19 March 2006 (CST)

Delete this article. It's a "flashlight" article, and further, there ARE no "rumors" that BSG is moving to NBC. ONE GUY speculated that on a messageboard, before i corrected him that A) It means less Black Market episodes, and B) they want to air it with the second season of Doctor Who. "What would you do differently as an Administrator?" --->I would have been able to delete this article immediately. Instead, we're now going to have to wait six-12 hours for one of the other Administrators to get around to doing it. --The Merovingian 00:43, 19 March 2006 (CST)

Rumors

Yes, this is a rumor article, and not technically an encyclopedia article. However, with Season 2 ending, this is an interesting article for fans to review and contemplate while we wait for Season 3. There have been significant rumors to the validity of this subject, and with the NBC schedule not set until this summer, this is a possibly true article.--Aboris26

No, it is not, for reasons I have cited above. There is no move to NBC; I was there, I am a driving force on the messageboards; we all concluded that one buffoon who doesn't even watch Scifi Channel regularly started this rumor and is spread like telephone-game to a news website. It has no basis in "fact" WHATSOEVER, and shall be removed ASAP. I am sorry, I do not want to land on you hard about this and this is your first time here, but this is a sensitive matter and the handling you have given it here is quite irresponsible. Please "lurk" around for a few days to get the flow of things around here and our Standards and Conventions. --The Merovingian 00:47, 19 March 2006 (CST)

I apologize for the nature of this post, and I now more fully understand both the source of the rumors and the nature of the Standards and Conventions. I will remove this article as soon as you reply to this response and place it in the 'blogosphere', an understandably more appropriate location for an article of this nature. I do understand that there are ZERO facts behind a possible move, however, its possibility has to be discussed by Battlestar Galactica fans. As you can see, I have attempted to improve the accuracy of serveral other articles. I have included possibilities of relsoultions to uncertain topics which may be consider speculation in the past, but I felt these were appropriate topics to be included in the articles. In the future I will attempt not advoid crossing the line between expansion of article and sepculation. Please see the new location of the article on this blog.

Contents