More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) worst case scenario |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) template example |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Worst Case == | == Worst Case == | ||
Worst case... we hardcode the html. As long as the content is all in editable templates, I think it's reasonable to have some html in the portals. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:27, 16 March 2006 (CST) | Worst case... we hardcode the html. As long as the content is all in editable templates, I think it's reasonable to have some html in the portals. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:27, 16 March 2006 (CST) | ||
== Interesting Example == | |||
I hardcoded the html, then copied the html into a template. Should work the same, right? Apparently not. When I use the template (Template:Steelheader), it's broken like the boxheader. But if you do subst: in front, it works correctly. Something behaves differently when a template is being used. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:52, 16 March 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 16 March 2006
Worst Case
Worst case... we hardcode the html. As long as the content is all in editable templates, I think it's reasonable to have some html in the portals. --Steelviper 11:27, 16 March 2006 (CST)
Interesting Example
I hardcoded the html, then copied the html into a template. Should work the same, right? Apparently not. When I use the template (Template:Steelheader), it's broken like the boxheader. But if you do subst: in front, it works correctly. Something behaves differently when a template is being used. --Steelviper 12:52, 16 March 2006 (CST)