Toggle menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

User talk:Undc23: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of User:Undc23
Spencerian (talk | contribs)
Character Template: Good addition!
Steelviper (talk | contribs)
thanks!
Line 7: Line 7:


Hi, there and welcome! Thanks for the addition of the character template. A similar format worked well in Wikipedia in topics such as The Matrix. I've made a tiny formatting change, but also wanted consensus on who should be defined as a character of note that should appear in the template. See the Talk page for the template for more. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 09:01, 28 December 2005 (EST)
Hi, there and welcome! Thanks for the addition of the character template. A similar format worked well in Wikipedia in topics such as The Matrix. I've made a tiny formatting change, but also wanted consensus on who should be defined as a character of note that should appear in the template. See the Talk page for the template for more. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 09:01, 28 December 2005 (EST)
== Disambig Work ==
Thanks for the industrious disambiguation work! It's down to a very reasonable number now. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 23:57, 21 January 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 04:57, 22 January 2006

Welcome to Battlestar Wiki

Hi there and welcome to Battlestar Wiki! Hope you enjoy it here! If you have any questions, feel free to direct it at either myself or one of the old hands around here! Looking forward to you contributions! -- Joe Beaudoin 23:37, 20 December 2005 (EST)

Character Template: Good addition!

Hi, there and welcome! Thanks for the addition of the character template. A similar format worked well in Wikipedia in topics such as The Matrix. I've made a tiny formatting change, but also wanted consensus on who should be defined as a character of note that should appear in the template. See the Talk page for the template for more. --Spencerian 09:01, 28 December 2005 (EST)

Disambig Work

Thanks for the industrious disambiguation work! It's down to a very reasonable number now. --Steelviper 23:57, 21 January 2006 (EST)