More actions
No edit summary |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Has it been clearly established that this is the only refinery ship in the fleet? If so, it should be merged with [[Refinery ship]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:34, 21 January 2006 (EST) | Has it been clearly established that this is the only refinery ship in the fleet? If so, it should be merged with [[Refinery ship]]. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 01:34, 21 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:It has not as of yet. We can merge the two anyway, since the info is the same. --[[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 01:37, 21 January 2006 (EST) | :It has not as of yet. We can merge the two anyway, since the info is the same. --[[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 01:37, 21 January 2006 (EST) | ||
::If there's more than one ship, we should keep them separate. I definitely heard Apollo refer to it as "''a'' tylium refinery", not "''the'' tylium refinery" (which doesn't settle it, but isn't good evidence for there being only one), so we should probably hold off on a merge. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:22, 21 January 2006 (EST) |
Revision as of 20:22, 21 January 2006
Has it been clearly established that this is the only refinery ship in the fleet? If so, it should be merged with Refinery ship. --Peter Farago 01:34, 21 January 2006 (EST)
- It has not as of yet. We can merge the two anyway, since the info is the same. --Joemc72 01:37, 21 January 2006 (EST)
- If there's more than one ship, we should keep them separate. I definitely heard Apollo refer to it as "a tylium refinery", not "the tylium refinery" (which doesn't settle it, but isn't good evidence for there being only one), so we should probably hold off on a merge. --Peter Farago 15:22, 21 January 2006 (EST)