Latest comment: 15 years ago by BklynBruzer in topic Caprica Six's actions
→Caprica Six's actions: reply |
BklynBruzer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Now, I know this might not entirely be supported by, well, anything, but my personal theory on what Six did was that, rather than move Julius into the new place she talked to Gaius about, I think she killed him. I really don't have anything to back this up, but her tone when she says "The last time I saw him, he seemed happy" just seems ominous to me. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 20:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC) | Now, I know this might not entirely be supported by, well, anything, but my personal theory on what Six did was that, rather than move Julius into the new place she talked to Gaius about, I think she killed him. I really don't have anything to back this up, but her tone when she says "The last time I saw him, he seemed happy" just seems ominous to me. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 20:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
: I don't share the theory. This would be a positively thoughtless thing to do as her aim was to gain Baltar's trust, not destroy it. Had she killed him, and since she had already admitted that she had a hand in moving Julius to the retirement home, it would make her suspect #1 if he were to turn up dead, don't you think? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 21:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC) | : I don't share the theory. This would be a positively thoughtless thing to do as her aim was to gain Baltar's trust, not destroy it. Had she killed him, and since she had already admitted that she had a hand in moving Julius to the retirement home, it would make her suspect #1 if he were to turn up dead, don't you think? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [[bsp:|Battlestar Pegasus]]</sup> 21:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
:: Yeah, but we don't really know the timescale between the Daybreak flashback and the attack - could've been a year, could've been months, could've been weeks. (Disclaimer: We might know the timescale, there's a distinct chance I missed it.) If it hadn't been too long, there's a chance she could've hidden the body or something and Gaius never checked up on him before the attack. Then again, I'm just groping here to justify my pet theory that is probably entirely wrong. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 03:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:39, 9 August 2009
Caprica Six's actions
Now, I know this might not entirely be supported by, well, anything, but my personal theory on what Six did was that, rather than move Julius into the new place she talked to Gaius about, I think she killed him. I really don't have anything to back this up, but her tone when she says "The last time I saw him, he seemed happy" just seems ominous to me. --BklynBruzer 20:43, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- I don't share the theory. This would be a positively thoughtless thing to do as her aim was to gain Baltar's trust, not destroy it. Had she killed him, and since she had already admitted that she had a hand in moving Julius to the retirement home, it would make her suspect #1 if he were to turn up dead, don't you think? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Battlestar Pegasus 21:49, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
- Yeah, but we don't really know the timescale between the Daybreak flashback and the attack - could've been a year, could've been months, could've been weeks. (Disclaimer: We might know the timescale, there's a distinct chance I missed it.) If it hadn't been too long, there's a chance she could've hidden the body or something and Gaius never checked up on him before the attack. Then again, I'm just groping here to justify my pet theory that is probably entirely wrong. --BklynBruzer 03:39, 9 August 2009 (UTC)