Talk:Columbia (TRS)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Columbia (TRS)/Archive 1
More actions
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I've noticed some speculation that this is the [[Wikipedia:lead ship|lead ship]] of the original battlestar class. Is there a source for this? Since it's still in service at a time when Galactica is supposedly the only remaining ship of its class (as per the miniseries), I find this unlikely. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:46, 28 September 2005 (EDT) | I've noticed some speculation that this is the [[Wikipedia:lead ship|lead ship]] of the original battlestar class. Is there a source for this? Since it's still in service at a time when Galactica is supposedly the only remaining ship of its class (as per the miniseries), I find this unlikely. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:46, 28 September 2005 (EDT) | ||
:The only source I've heard, noted in the Zoic information, was that all of the original battlestars except Galactica were upgraded. Zoic's original battlestar data matches some of the mentioned destroyed battlestars from the Battlestar article as well. If that is the case, none of the other original battlestars were likely to have survived the backdoor rooting that their networked computers allowed. I can verify nothing on Columbia, and until we get some studio data, I still see all this information suspect. [[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:26, 28 September 2005 (EDT) | |||
Revision as of 18:26, 28 September 2005
I've noticed some speculation that this is the lead ship of the original battlestar class. Is there a source for this? Since it's still in service at a time when Galactica is supposedly the only remaining ship of its class (as per the miniseries), I find this unlikely. --Peter Farago 12:46, 28 September 2005 (EDT)
- The only source I've heard, noted in the Zoic information, was that all of the original battlestars except Galactica were upgraded. Zoic's original battlestar data matches some of the mentioned destroyed battlestars from the Battlestar article as well. If that is the case, none of the other original battlestars were likely to have survived the backdoor rooting that their networked computers allowed. I can verify nothing on Columbia, and until we get some studio data, I still see all this information suspect. Spencerian 14:26, 28 September 2005 (EDT)