Talk:Parsec/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 04:04, 16 June 2007

Should there be a page for light year as well? It occurs frequently in the RDM dialog, and technically speaking it is a continuity error. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nnnnnnnn (talk • contribs).

Not really. This article probably needn't exist at all, either. Battlestar Wiki BW:NOT isn't a general encyclopedia, and we don't generally allow articles on mundane or ordinary objects. A "parsec" is still a parsec, however misused, although it appears that the Re-imagined Series uses it much more accurately. --Spencerian 23:04, 15 June 2007 (CDT)

Revision as of 01:46, 16 June 2007 view source Nnnnnnnn (talk \| contribs) 1 edit New page: Should there be a page for light year as well? It occurs frequently in the RDM dialog, and technically speaking it is a continuity error.		Revision as of 04:04, 16 June 2007 view source Spencerian (talk \| contribs) Senior Chiefs, Marines, interwiki, Sponsors, Chiefs 9,127 edits +reply Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Should there be a page for light year as well? It occurs frequently in the RDM dialog, and technically speaking it is a continuity error.		Should there be a page for light year as well? It occurs frequently in the RDM dialog, and technically speaking it is a continuity error. {{unsigned\|Nnnnnnnn}}
			:Not really. This article probably needn't exist at all, either. Battlestar Wiki [[BW:NOT]] isn't a general encyclopedia, and we [[BW:TERM\|don't generally allow articles on mundane or ordinary objects]]. A "parsec" is still a parsec, however misused, although it appears that the Re-imagined Series uses it much more accurately. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 23:04, 15 June 2007 (CDT)