Talk:Cyrannus (TOS)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
More actions
Spencerian (talk | contribs) Article update |
Possible info about the Cyrannus System? |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I concised this article to remove the self-argumentative counterpoints and to focus on the most probable use of the name. The article is shortened, but is now more relevant. There is really no further data that can be used, I feel, and other speculation does not fit to the few facts that can be derived from the single season of the series. If ''[[Galactica 1980]]'' information is added, it strongly supports the single-galaxy-but-differing-name probability since the Exodus to Earth took 30 years as noted there. Given that the speeds and method of [[Propulsion (TOS)|propulsion]] in either series was never defined, it's more likely (despite the still-fantastic nature of it) to conclude that travel across a portion of a large galaxy of over 100,000 light-years in size is more probable in 30 years than intra-galactic travel over several million (or more) light-years. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 09:17, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | I concised this article to remove the self-argumentative counterpoints and to focus on the most probable use of the name. The article is shortened, but is now more relevant. There is really no further data that can be used, I feel, and other speculation does not fit to the few facts that can be derived from the single season of the series. If ''[[Galactica 1980]]'' information is added, it strongly supports the single-galaxy-but-differing-name probability since the Exodus to Earth took 30 years as noted there. Given that the speeds and method of [[Propulsion (TOS)|propulsion]] in either series was never defined, it's more likely (despite the still-fantastic nature of it) to conclude that travel across a portion of a large galaxy of over 100,000 light-years in size is more probable in 30 years than intra-galactic travel over several million (or more) light-years. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 09:17, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Possible Map? == | |||
Hey! :-) I've just come across some piece of fan speculation and I wanted to give it to the experts, so you can decided if it's useful information for the Cyrannus (TOS) article: [http://www.geocities.com/Area51/Corridor/4590/map.html Cyrannus System Map?] | |||
The entire website around the map has lots of info about the Cyrannus System but I have a hard time deciding what's canon and what's made up for a Role Play Game. Greetings, --[[User:CC-Mel|CC-Mel]] 06:01, 14 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 11:01, 14 May 2007
Article update
I concised this article to remove the self-argumentative counterpoints and to focus on the most probable use of the name. The article is shortened, but is now more relevant. There is really no further data that can be used, I feel, and other speculation does not fit to the few facts that can be derived from the single season of the series. If Galactica 1980 information is added, it strongly supports the single-galaxy-but-differing-name probability since the Exodus to Earth took 30 years as noted there. Given that the speeds and method of propulsion in either series was never defined, it's more likely (despite the still-fantastic nature of it) to conclude that travel across a portion of a large galaxy of over 100,000 light-years in size is more probable in 30 years than intra-galactic travel over several million (or more) light-years. --Spencerian 09:17, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
Possible Map?
Hey! :-) I've just come across some piece of fan speculation and I wanted to give it to the experts, so you can decided if it's useful information for the Cyrannus (TOS) article: Cyrannus System Map? The entire website around the map has lots of info about the Cyrannus System but I have a hard time deciding what's canon and what's made up for a Role Play Game. Greetings, --CC-Mel 06:01, 14 May 2007 (CDT)