Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for May 2007: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m Cylons (RDM) is pretty cool anyway |
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) m Battle of New Caprica: an excellent choice |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==[[Cylon Centurion]]== | ==[[Cylon Centurion]]== | ||
* {{ | * {{Neutral}} - I'd prefer this article over [[Cylons (RDM)]] ... great related imagery section, detailed analysis, I like it. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
* {{Support}} - Agree with Jubal. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:45, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | * {{Support}} - Agree with Jubal. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:45, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
::{{comment}}: Aw, and I thought my recent changes with the dual pictures of Six and a bullethead were just ''witty''. :) Still, from an information perspective, I guess I can understand. It's not like we're sensationalism over substance like CNN or something. :P --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:30, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ::{{comment}}: Aw, and I thought my recent changes with the dual pictures of Six and a bullethead were just ''witty''. :) Still, from an information perspective, I guess I can understand. It's not like we're sensationalism over substance like CNN or something. :P --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 15:30, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
:::Don't get me wrong, Spencerian ... I like it, it's clean, simple, gets the job done. It's a great one sheet intro to the Cylons! I have changed my vote to Neutral. :) [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 18:57, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | :::Don't get me wrong, Spencerian ... I like it, it's clean, simple, gets the job done. It's a great one sheet intro to the Cylons! I have changed my vote to Neutral. :) [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 18:57, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | ||
==[[Battle of New Caprica]]== | |||
* {{Support}} - Hmm, yes. Great images, detail, writing. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 19:18, 10 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 00:18, 11 April 2007
Cylon Centurion
Neutral - I'd prefer this article over Cylons (RDM) ... great related imagery section, detailed analysis, I like it. JubalHarshaw 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
Support - Agree with Jubal. --BklynBruzer 18:45, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
Cylons (RDM)
- Neutral - Not that it isn't a good article, it's just that something strikes me wrong about it. It's almost poetry more than an encyclopedia article. Not that that is bad. Just ... non-FA, IMHO. JubalHarshaw 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
Oppose I don't know. It feels more like a better disambiguation than an article in its own right --Serenity 15:20, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
Comment: Aw, and I thought my recent changes with the dual pictures of Six and a bullethead were just witty. :) Still, from an information perspective, I guess I can understand. It's not like we're sensationalism over substance like CNN or something. :P --Spencerian 15:30, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
- Don't get me wrong, Spencerian ... I like it, it's clean, simple, gets the job done. It's a great one sheet intro to the Cylons! I have changed my vote to Neutral. :) JubalHarshaw 18:57, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
Battle of New Caprica
- Support - Hmm, yes. Great images, detail, writing. JubalHarshaw 19:18, 10 April 2007 (CDT)