Toggle menu
Toggle preferences menu
Toggle personal menu
Not logged in
Your IP address will be publicly visible if you make any edits.

Template talk:Deletetalk: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of Template:Deletetalk
Catrope (talk | contribs)
+reply
Steelviper (talk | contribs)
all of this has happened before, all of this will happen again
Line 5: Line 5:
::::''We may want to come up with a template for the discussion page that says, "This article (Foo) has been previously deleted. For a discussion of why it was deleted see: Delete Discussion Archives:Foo".''
::::''We may want to come up with a template for the discussion page that says, "This article (Foo) has been previously deleted. For a discussion of why it was deleted see: Delete Discussion Archives:Foo".''
:::--[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)
:::--[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)
::::That Spencerian is a really smart dude. I'm tellin' ya. I agree that if we went with option #3 we'd definitely need to give some though to how the frak people would find the archived discussion in a different namespace. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:23, 7 March 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 17:23, 7 March 2007

Using this template on the article page itself, would still count towards "Main Space" article count. So this is unnecessary. Shane (T - C - E) 10:27, 7 March 2007 (CST)

It's supposed to go on the Talk page of the late article. --Catrope 10:39, 7 March 2007 (CST)
Only if your in agreement with method 1. The whole namespace one even the talk page gets axed. Shane (T - C - E) 10:45, 7 March 2007 (CST)
This template is intended as some sort of a compromise between methods 1 and 3. The article is deleted, the talkp page is moved to the Deleted Discussion: mainspace (or Deleted talk: if we're gonna have a Deleted: for temporarily undeleted articles) and this tag goes on the original talk page. Wasn't even my idea, but Spencerian's:
We may want to come up with a template for the discussion page that says, "This article (Foo) has been previously deleted. For a discussion of why it was deleted see: Delete Discussion Archives:Foo".
--Catrope 11:18, 7 March 2007 (CST)
That Spencerian is a really smart dude. I'm tellin' ya. I agree that if we went with option #3 we'd definitely need to give some though to how the frak people would find the archived discussion in a different namespace. --Steelviper 11:23, 7 March 2007 (CST)