More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) + kudos |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Kudos, and an edit conflict == | == Kudos, and an edit conflict == | ||
Excellent work! You do a much better job of filtering out some of the clutter than I did when I began. I did run into an edit conflict saving my verification changes, but I think our change in the teaser overlapped (the italicizing of ''Galactica'') so I think we're ok. You might want to double (triple?) check me, though. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:05, 5 February 2007 (CST) | Excellent work! You do a much better job of filtering out some of the clutter than I did when I began. I did run into an edit conflict saving my verification changes, but I think our change in the teaser overlapped (the italicizing of ''Galactica'') so I think we're ok. You might want to double (triple?) check me, though. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:05, 5 February 2007 (CST) | ||
:You're right that the only thing I ever changed in the teaser today was the italicization of ''Galactica'' (which is not a terribly important issue), so if you reapplied that, you're OK. Thanks for the kudos BTW, I should probably tell you, though, that English is not my native language, that's why I sometimes don't know more obscure words and run whatever I think to hear through [http://www.dictionary.com dictionary.com]. Sometimes the word I thought to hear actually exists (much to my surprise) and makes sense in context (an even greater surprise), but if I'm not that lucky I dramatically misspell the word and dictionary.com fails on me, so I have to put "(unintelligible)" for a word that I hear pretty well, but which I simply don't know. That's why it always helps to get a native speaker go over it and get the exotic words right. | |||
BTW, I expect to finish up this one tomorrow, then I'll start verifying your work on TaB. | |||
BTW2, isn't it possible to somehow lock down a podcast article? That would be very useful, since with people committing massive additions in one piece, edit conflicts are quite likely to occur. --[[User:Catrope|Catrope]] 15:23, 5 February 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 21:23, 5 February 2007
Kudos, and an edit conflict
Excellent work! You do a much better job of filtering out some of the clutter than I did when I began. I did run into an edit conflict saving my verification changes, but I think our change in the teaser overlapped (the italicizing of Galactica) so I think we're ok. You might want to double (triple?) check me, though. --Steelviper 15:05, 5 February 2007 (CST)
- You're right that the only thing I ever changed in the teaser today was the italicization of Galactica (which is not a terribly important issue), so if you reapplied that, you're OK. Thanks for the kudos BTW, I should probably tell you, though, that English is not my native language, that's why I sometimes don't know more obscure words and run whatever I think to hear through dictionary.com. Sometimes the word I thought to hear actually exists (much to my surprise) and makes sense in context (an even greater surprise), but if I'm not that lucky I dramatically misspell the word and dictionary.com fails on me, so I have to put "(unintelligible)" for a word that I hear pretty well, but which I simply don't know. That's why it always helps to get a native speaker go over it and get the exotic words right.
BTW, I expect to finish up this one tomorrow, then I'll start verifying your work on TaB. BTW2, isn't it possible to somehow lock down a podcast article? That would be very useful, since with people committing massive additions in one piece, edit conflicts are quite likely to occur. --Catrope 15:23, 5 February 2007 (CST)