Spencerian (talk | contribs) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) →Battle of the Resurrection Ship: + support |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
*{{support}} [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 07:20, 5 January 2007 (CST) | *{{support}} [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 07:20, 5 January 2007 (CST) | ||
*{{support}} The battle pages are some of the best articles on the wiki. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:54, 5 January 2007 (CST) | *{{support}} The battle pages are some of the best articles on the wiki. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:54, 5 January 2007 (CST) | ||
*{{support}} Casualties: 4. Wow. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:06, 5 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 20:06, 5 January 2007
Comments
More votes, please. --Steelviper 07:17, 5 January 2007 (CST)
Flashlight
Support. As per my usual. --BklynBruzer 00:24, 24 December 2006 (CST)
- Support. I support any and all of the quality Silly pages listed for Featured Article status! =) I know that doesn't really help choose one ... I'll try! JubalHarshaw 11:55, 22 December 2006 (CST)
Battle of the Resurrection Ship
- Support. Its well fleshed out, it was an important event, and frankly, its not a silly article. We haven't run out of good ones yet, so maybe we should wait to go to silly ones. --Hobbesy 22:10, 26 December 2006 (CST)
- Support Shane (T - C - E) 07:20, 5 January 2007 (CST)
- Support The battle pages are some of the best articles on the wiki. --Spencerian 10:54, 5 January 2007 (CST)
- Support Casualties: 4. Wow. --Steelviper 14:06, 5 January 2007 (CST)