+ Created |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) + breaks |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
<!-- Use Template {{Support}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | <!-- Use Template {{Support}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | ||
# | # | ||
<br clear="all" /> | |||
'''Oppose''' | '''Oppose''' | ||
<!-- Use Template {{Oppose}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | <!-- Use Template {{Oppose}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | ||
# | # | ||
<br clear="all" /> | |||
'''Neutral''' | '''Neutral''' | ||
<!-- Use Template {{Neutral}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | <!-- Use Template {{Neutral}} and then post a reason followed by your signature --> | ||
# | # | ||
<br clear="all" /> | |||
==== Comments ==== | ==== Comments ==== | ||
* | * | ||
<br clear="all" /> | |||
==== Questions for the candidate ==== | ==== Questions for the candidate ==== | ||
Revision as of 18:48, 5 January 2007
Spencerian[edit]
Votes[edit]
- Current Count: (0/0/0)
- Current Date/Time: Sunday, December 22, 2024 at 01:57 (UTC)
- RFB Ending:
Spencerian (talk • contribs • edit count • page moves • block user • block log) – Spencerian always manages, like myself, to get involved with everything so why not take it one further. While creating these pages and templates just to nominate Spencerian, I was reading Wikipedia:Successful bureaucratship candidacies, a few words popup from the pages of previous nominations.
- impartial
- respectful
- trustworthy
- diligent
And so on. Usually on Wikipedia most of the RFBs are self-nominations because the only real power they have is changing user rights. Here was having separate nominations process for BW:MOVE and the sort. So without further ado, here is Spencerian. "Take the Blue Pill, stay as Sysop. Take the Red Pill, and I show you how far you can go." Shane (T - C - E) 12:45, 5 January 2007 (CST)
- Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:
Support
Oppose
Neutral
Comments[edit]
Questions for the candidate[edit]
- 1. Have you read the discussions on when to promote and not promote? What do you understand the criteria for promotion to be?
- A.
- 2. How would you deal with contentious nominations where a decision to promote or not promote might be criticized?
- A.
- 3. Battlestar Wiki expect Bureaucrats to adhere to high standards of fairness, knowledge of policy and the ability to engage others in the community. Why do you feel you meet those standards?
- A.
- 4. If you become a bureaucrat, will you pledge not to discuss promotion or non-promotion of potential admins on any other forum during the course of nominations and especially when making a decision? And to discuss issues of promotion or non-promotion only with other bureaucrats, in their talk, where such discussion would be transparent?
- A.
- 5. Do you have the time and do you have the desire to visit BW:RFA on a regular basis to see to the promotion or delisting of candidates in a timely manner?
- A.