More actions
Ericshirey03 (talk | contribs) |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) →Copyrighted Content?: copyright thoughts |
||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
:Hey, if you could stop contributing for a moment, we'd appreciate it if you could address the copyright concerns. The content of this site falls under the creative commons license, and the content added needs to be your own (or be fair use, or have permission from the author). If you continue adding the copyrighted reviews we may have to block you from contributing until the copyright concerns have been addressed. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:16, 3 January 2007 (CST) | :Hey, if you could stop contributing for a moment, we'd appreciate it if you could address the copyright concerns. The content of this site falls under the creative commons license, and the content added needs to be your own (or be fair use, or have permission from the author). If you continue adding the copyrighted reviews we may have to block you from contributing until the copyright concerns have been addressed. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 10:16, 3 January 2007 (CST) | ||
<br><br>I believe that since I have given proper credit to the site that this was taken from, it would be covered under fair use. i also emailed the author just to make sure he was alright with it. | <br><br>I believe that since I have given proper credit to the site that this was taken from, it would be covered under fair use. i also emailed the author just to make sure he was alright with it. | ||
:A few cited quotes might fall under fair use, but the wholesale copy almost surely wouldn't. (Though Peter Farago is our copyright expert around here.) Thanks for contacting the author. We could definitely post a link to his site (external links), but unless he gives permission for us to use his content we probably should remove the actual text. If we do get permission to copy his work wholesale (which would be very generous), we might want to consider revising the prose to be more encyclopedic (just the fact, ma'am) rather than having bias. Any good review is going to have bias, but we're looking more for the facts (like the plot points, etc.) Thanks for responding, and for taking the initiative in contacting the author. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 13:46, 3 January 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 19:46, 3 January 2007
Welcome to Battlestar Wiki!
Welcome to the Wiki, Ericshirey03. Feel free to tell us about yourself on your user page. Before you get started on other edits, please read the Standards and Conventions, which details the policies we use in editing pages (this differs from many other wikis in its particular use of verb tense, abbreviations, formatting, and the like). If you need help in learning how to use the MediaWiki tools supported here, you can check out the tutorial and the wiki markup code pages for assistance.
Please read the articles "What is Battlestar Wiki" and "What Battlestar Wiki is Not." This important information details what contributions are acceptable in this encyclopedia.
We encourage you to participate in any projects on Battlestar Wiki, which work to enhance a particular subject or extension of the wiki. These include the Original Series Article Development Project and several language translations of Battlestar Wiki. If you have a new idea for a new project, visit the Think Tank, where we hash out large-scale ideas before implementing them.
Also, if you have any questions or suggestions you wish to offer, please feel free to do so either on an article's talk page that's relevant to the subject, the Wikipedian Quorum or the Administrators' noticeboard. Remember to sign your posts on any talk pages using four tildes (~~~~)!
We look forward to your contributions to the community! --Steelviper 09:51, 3 January 2007 (CST)
Copyrighted Content?
Your recent book reviews contributions appear identical to copyrighted works such as this one. Are you the author of those works, or do you otherwise have permission of the author to report their work here? Thanks. --Steelviper 09:51, 3 January 2007 (CST)
- Hey, if you could stop contributing for a moment, we'd appreciate it if you could address the copyright concerns. The content of this site falls under the creative commons license, and the content added needs to be your own (or be fair use, or have permission from the author). If you continue adding the copyrighted reviews we may have to block you from contributing until the copyright concerns have been addressed. --Steelviper 10:16, 3 January 2007 (CST)
I believe that since I have given proper credit to the site that this was taken from, it would be covered under fair use. i also emailed the author just to make sure he was alright with it.
- A few cited quotes might fall under fair use, but the wholesale copy almost surely wouldn't. (Though Peter Farago is our copyright expert around here.) Thanks for contacting the author. We could definitely post a link to his site (external links), but unless he gives permission for us to use his content we probably should remove the actual text. If we do get permission to copy his work wholesale (which would be very generous), we might want to consider revising the prose to be more encyclopedic (just the fact, ma'am) rather than having bias. Any good review is going to have bias, but we're looking more for the facts (like the plot points, etc.) Thanks for responding, and for taking the initiative in contacting the author. --Steelviper 13:46, 3 January 2007 (CST)