Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for November 2006: Difference between revisions
From Battlestar Wiki, the free, open content Battlestar Galactica encyclopedia and episode guide
More actions
No edit summary |
BklynBruzer (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
== [[Adama (TOS)]] == | == [[Adama (TOS)]] == | ||
{{support}} - How better to compare/contrast the new vs. old Adama than back to back features? I didn't nominate this article, but it would be nice to show some TOS love. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:35, 31 October 2006 (CST) | {{support}} - How better to compare/contrast the new vs. old Adama than back to back features? I didn't nominate this article, but it would be nice to show some TOS love. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:35, 31 October 2006 (CST) | ||
==Flashlight== | |||
{{support}} - My personal favorite silly page (Sorry drinking game), I think it deserves some love. --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 18:59, 8 November 2006 (CST) |
Revision as of 00:59, 9 November 2006
Notice
This FA will go on for till Friday. Get your votes in now. Shane (T - C - E) 23:38, 7 November 2006 (CST)
Comments
I've made it my mission to get a silly page as featured article. --BklynBruzer 08:43, 16 October 2006 (CDT)
- I love the silly pages, and will defend their right to exist to the death, but I don't think they're appropriate for a featured article. --Peter Farago 18:16, 30 October 2006 (CST)
- I have to concur with Peter, although Toaster is arguably our most humorous article. It seems more appropriate to have our encyclopedic articles stand out. --Spencerian 08:17, 31 October 2006 (CST)
Adama (TOS)
Support - How better to compare/contrast the new vs. old Adama than back to back features? I didn't nominate this article, but it would be nice to show some TOS love. --Steelviper 15:35, 31 October 2006 (CST)
Flashlight
Support - My personal favorite silly page (Sorry drinking game), I think it deserves some love. --BklynBruzer 18:59, 8 November 2006 (CST)