Talk:Micron/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:56, 20 October 2006

Is "(specifically, 0.6 seconds)" accurate? I don't remember centon being defined that exactly. --PrePressChris 14:23, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

I can't give you an episode reference, but if one centon is one minute and contains 100 microns, then one micron is 0.6 seconds --Serenity 14:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

True, but if one micron is one second, then a centon is a bit over a minute and a half, a centar is two and a half hours, etc. Do we know that any one of those units were defined to be exact equivalents? I thought that they were only roughly analagous. --PrePressChris 14:56, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

Revision as of 19:33, 20 October 2006 view source Serenity (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 12,473 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 19:56, 20 October 2006 view source PrePressChris (talk \| contribs) 392 edits + reply Newer edit →
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:I can't give you an episode reference, but if one centon is one minute and contains 100 microns, then one micron is 0.6 seconds --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT)		:I can't give you an episode reference, but if one centon is one minute and contains 100 microns, then one micron is 0.6 seconds --[[User:Serenity\|Serenity]] 14:33, 20 October 2006 (CDT)

			::True, but if one micron is one second, then a centon is a bit over a minute and a half, a centar is two and a half hours, etc. Do we know that any one of those units were defined to be exact equivalents? I thought that they were only roughly analagous. --[[User:PrePressChris\|PrePressChris]] 14:56, 20 October 2006 (CDT)