Battlestar Wiki talk:Think Tank/Poll Template: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Think Tank/Poll Template
More actions
No edit summary |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I can't visualize how this is going to work well, but I think it would take away from our normal way of getting consensus through discussion. We could just call votes as we always do, i thought. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 19:49, 10 July 2006 (CDT) | I can't visualize how this is going to work well, but I think it would take away from our normal way of getting consensus through discussion. We could just call votes as we always do, i thought. --[[User:The Merovingian|The Merovingian]] <sup>([[Special:Contributions/The Merovingian|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/The Merovingian|E]])</sup> 19:49, 10 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
:Since I can't post a visual aid, I'm sorry. I can't explain it any better than I did. There is an example out on the template itself, but I can't show you an example of how it can work without violating the rules. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 19:56, 10 July 2006 (CDT) | :Since I can't post a visual aid, I'm sorry. I can't explain it any better than I did. There is an example out on the template itself, but I can't show you an example of how it can work without violating the rules. --[[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 19:56, 10 July 2006 (CDT) | ||
I'm not sure what this does that can't be accomplished with a new header, a few lines of text, and the (attractive) {{tl|support}}, {{tl|neutral}}, and {{tl|oppose}} templates. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 20:01, 10 July 2006 (CDT) |
Revision as of 01:01, 11 July 2006
I can't visualize how this is going to work well, but I think it would take away from our normal way of getting consensus through discussion. We could just call votes as we always do, i thought. --The Merovingian (C - E) 19:49, 10 July 2006 (CDT)
- Since I can't post a visual aid, I'm sorry. I can't explain it any better than I did. There is an example out on the template itself, but I can't show you an example of how it can work without violating the rules. --Shane (T - C - E) 19:56, 10 July 2006 (CDT)
I'm not sure what this does that can't be accomplished with a new header, a few lines of text, and the (attractive) {{support}}, {{neutral}}, and {{oppose}} templates. --Peter Farago 20:01, 10 July 2006 (CDT)