Battlestar Wiki talk:Citation Jihad: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Battlestar Wiki:Citation Jihad
More actions
April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
:It's been listed for months, and nobody's offered a source. We can probably smite it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:32, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | :It's been listed for months, and nobody's offered a source. We can probably smite it. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 12:32, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
::So it sounds like this is more of one of those "shoot on sight" situations rather than the elaborate recon, paint it with a laser, and drop a laser-guided "smart bomb" on it type of operations. So there won't be a "articles with anonymous/unofficial sources" categories or anything, as (hopefully) it would quickly be rendered obsolete? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:40, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | ::So it sounds like this is more of one of those "shoot on sight" situations rather than the elaborate recon, paint it with a laser, and drop a laser-guided "smart bomb" on it type of operations. So there won't be a "articles with anonymous/unofficial sources" categories or anything, as (hopefully) it would quickly be rendered obsolete? --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:40, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | ||
: | |||
: As possibly known by everyone by now, I've already expunged the episodes that weren't verified by official sources, as well as references to those episodes. Other than that, if there's any other articles that have unsourced and unofficial "facts" within them, they are free to dispose of them. (Or list them on this talk page.) -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]]</sup> 12:56, 10 May 2006 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 17:56, 10 May 2006
- Citation Consistency, Request for name change, BSG: The Magazine, Citation Format, Character Ages, Railguns, Twelve Lords of Kobol, Magazine Content, To Do, BSG Books, Sources namespace
Expunge List
Is there any central list of articles that need to be "expunged" per the new source policy? One example I found on Citation Jihad mission list:
I wasn't 100% sure that the "Joyce" bit needed to be pulled, but I thought I'd note it so somebody more confident of the application of the rules might smite it. --Steelviper 12:23, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
- It's been listed for months, and nobody's offered a source. We can probably smite it. --Peter Farago 12:32, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
- So it sounds like this is more of one of those "shoot on sight" situations rather than the elaborate recon, paint it with a laser, and drop a laser-guided "smart bomb" on it type of operations. So there won't be a "articles with anonymous/unofficial sources" categories or anything, as (hopefully) it would quickly be rendered obsolete? --Steelviper 12:40, 10 May 2006 (CDT)
- As possibly known by everyone by now, I've already expunged the episodes that weren't verified by official sources, as well as references to those episodes. Other than that, if there's any other articles that have unsourced and unofficial "facts" within them, they are free to dispose of them. (Or list them on this talk page.) -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate 12:56, 10 May 2006 (CDT)