Talk:History of the Twelve Colonies of Kobol/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Discussion page of History of the Twelve Colonies of Kobol/Archive 1
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
 
Line 2: Line 2:


--[[User:Gizmojumpjet|Colonial Historiographer]] 13:05, 20 Jan 2005 (EST)
--[[User:Gizmojumpjet|Colonial Historiographer]] 13:05, 20 Jan 2005 (EST)
**This is definatly fan fictioan.  None of this had been said in the series or RDM's blog.  It also contradicts the series.  It claims the Articles are over 200 yrs old not 52 as in Colonial Day. ([[User:Alphaboi867|Alphaboi867]] 01:07, 31 Mar 2005 (EST))

Latest revision as of 06:07, 31 March 2005

Isn't this a piece of fan fiction? Can the colony names included here be considered canonical? If not, should the page be edit to make it clear that it is not?

--Colonial Historiographer 13:05, 20 Jan 2005 (EST)

    • This is definatly fan fictioan. None of this had been said in the series or RDM's blog. It also contradicts the series. It claims the Articles are over 200 yrs old not 52 as in Colonial Day. (Alphaboi867 01:07, 31 Mar 2005 (EST))