More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) + looking good |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
== Interesting Example == | == Interesting Example == | ||
I hardcoded the html, then copied the html into a template. Should work the same, right? Apparently not. When I use the template (Template:Steelheader), it's broken like the boxheader. But if you do subst: in front, it works correctly. Something behaves differently when a template is being used. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:52, 16 March 2006 (CST) | I hardcoded the html, then copied the html into a template. Should work the same, right? Apparently not. When I use the template (Template:Steelheader), it's broken like the boxheader. But if you do subst: in front, it works correctly. Something behaves differently when a template is being used. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 12:52, 16 March 2006 (CST) | ||
== Looking Good == | |||
It shows a lot of promise. A couple of questions: | |||
# Navigation. Is there going to be some sort of a navigation (not unlike the character template) to cut straight down into the characters people would most likely want to access? | |||
# RDM content. Are we going to keep the portals RDM only? I kind of liked the idea of supporting all of the series with the portals, but the reality is that the TOS and 1980 gets a lot less traffic, and might be plenty served just by having portals of their own (the TOS and 1980 portals) rather than getting a share of the character portal. It looks like you're running out of real estate just with RDM stuff. | |||
That's all I've got for now... --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 21:11, 16 March 2006 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 03:11, 17 March 2006
Worst Case
Worst case... we hardcode the html. As long as the content is all in editable templates, I think it's reasonable to have some html in the portals. --Steelviper 11:27, 16 March 2006 (CST)
- Once article becomes Portal, it should work according to the IRC group. --Shane 16:28, 16 March 2006 (CST)
Interesting Example
I hardcoded the html, then copied the html into a template. Should work the same, right? Apparently not. When I use the template (Template:Steelheader), it's broken like the boxheader. But if you do subst: in front, it works correctly. Something behaves differently when a template is being used. --Steelviper 12:52, 16 March 2006 (CST)
Looking Good
It shows a lot of promise. A couple of questions:
- Navigation. Is there going to be some sort of a navigation (not unlike the character template) to cut straight down into the characters people would most likely want to access?
- RDM content. Are we going to keep the portals RDM only? I kind of liked the idea of supporting all of the series with the portals, but the reality is that the TOS and 1980 gets a lot less traffic, and might be plenty served just by having portals of their own (the TOS and 1980 portals) rather than getting a share of the character portal. It looks like you're running out of real estate just with RDM stuff.
That's all I've got for now... --Steelviper 21:11, 16 March 2006 (CST)