More actions
Ltcrashdown (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Yes, but Caprica Six is specifically applied to the one that manipulated Baltar. Once you see the episode, you'll probably agree. --Ltcrashdown 22:32, 24 February 2006 (EST) | :Yes, but Caprica Six is specifically applied to the one that manipulated Baltar. Once you see the episode, you'll probably agree. --Ltcrashdown 22:32, 24 February 2006 (EST) | ||
::I'm just imagining something like this: | |||
:::D'Anna #1: Hey, Six! | |||
:::12 Numbers Six: Yes? | |||
:::D'Anna #1: No, ''Caprica'' Six! | |||
:::7 Caprica Numbers Six: Yes? | |||
:::D'Anna #1: Aw, frak it. | |||
:::--[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 22:35, 24 February 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 03:35, 25 February 2006
I haven't seen the episode, but I already can tell this term is going to be problematic. Presumably, there are currently many, many, copies of Number Six resident on Caprica, several of which we have encountered in minor roles throughout the first and early part of the second season. --Peter Farago 22:29, 24 February 2006 (EST)
- Yes, but Caprica Six is specifically applied to the one that manipulated Baltar. Once you see the episode, you'll probably agree. --Ltcrashdown 22:32, 24 February 2006 (EST)
- I'm just imagining something like this:
- D'Anna #1: Hey, Six!
- 12 Numbers Six: Yes?
- D'Anna #1: No, Caprica Six!
- 7 Caprica Numbers Six: Yes?
- D'Anna #1: Aw, frak it.
- --Peter Farago 22:35, 24 February 2006 (EST)
- I'm just imagining something like this: