Talk:Scar (Raider)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 05:31, 16 October 2006

Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --Peter Farago 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST)

I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --Spencerian 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)

Article name

Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --Undc23 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)

I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --Spencerian 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)

I agree. --Peter Farago 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST)

Callsign/Nickname? again

Changing "Callsign" to "Nickname", as Raiders (insofar as we know) don't have Callsigns - they're essentially like hunting dogs, and for all we know, the Cylons call him "Spot" (assuming "he" is a he to begin with). In short, it was the pilots who named the Raider as such and thus not a callsign.--み使い Mitsukai 00:31, 16 October 2006 (CDT)

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 :I agree. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST)
+== Callsign/Nickname? again ==
+Changing "Callsign" to "Nickname", as Raiders (insofar as we know) don't have Callsigns - they're essentially like hunting dogs, and for all we know, the Cylons call him "Spot" (assuming "he" is a he to begin with).  In short, it was the pilots who named the Raider as such and thus not a callsign.--<font color="#4b0082">[[User:Mitsukai|み使い]]</font> <font color="#2f4f4f">''[[User_talk:Mitsukai|Mitsukai]]''</font> 00:31, 16 October 2006 (CDT)