Talk:Scar (Raider)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Scar (Raider)/Archive 1
More actions
Spencerian (talk | contribs) |
April Arcus (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST) | :I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST) | ||
:I agree. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 02:49, 5 February 2006
Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --Peter Farago 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST)
- I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --Spencerian 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)
Article name
Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --Undc23 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)
- I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --Spencerian 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)
- I agree. --Peter Farago 21:49, 4 February 2006 (EST)