Talk:Scar (Raider)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 01:48, 5 February 2006

Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --Peter Farago 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST)

I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --Spencerian 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)

Article name

Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --Undc23 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)

I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --Spencerian 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)

Revision as of 01:40, 5 February 2006 view source Undc23 (talk \| contribs) 1,402 edits m oops, sorry ← Older edit		Revision as of 01:48, 5 February 2006 view source Spencerian (talk \| contribs) Senior Chiefs, Marines, interwiki, Sponsors, Chiefs 9,127 edits →‎Article name Newer edit →
Line 6:		Line 6:

	Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)		Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23\|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)

			:I tend to agree, Undc. Feel free to move this page to a properly named space if there is no objection from others. --[[User:Spencerian\|Spencerian]] 20:48, 4 February 2006 (EST)