Talk:Scar (Raider)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of Scar (Raider)/Archive 1
More actions
Article name |
Article name |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. | Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. | ||
== Article name == | |||
Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --[[User:Undc23|Undc23]] 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 01:40, 5 February 2006
Aren't the spoiler header and spoiltext tags redundant? --Peter Farago 21:06, 31 January 2006 (EST)
- I was torn here when I updated it. Since the whole article is a spoiler, but the article is too short to stop reading before you see the banner, I left it as is. It'll be there for three more days at best, anyway. --Spencerian 21:24, 31 January 2006 (EST)
Article name
Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine.
Article name
Surely "Scar (Raider)" would be much better than "Scar (fightercraft)"? Raider is far more accurate and precise, and fightercraft implies that it's a model of craft, not an individual, and that it's purely a machine. --Undc23 20:40, 4 February 2006 (EST)