Steelviper (talk | contribs) thanks! |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
A fair enough assessment, I'll blank the thing again and start from scratch. :) [[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 15:04, 31 January 2006 (EST) | A fair enough assessment, I'll blank the thing again and start from scratch. :) [[User:Joemc72|Joemc72]] 15:04, 31 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:Thanks! Hopefully one of our license experts might weigh in (I think Peter Farago usually speaks up about such things). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 15:49, 31 January 2006 (EST) | |||
Revision as of 20:49, 31 January 2006
License Issues with Wikipedia
Although I GREATLY appreciate ANY attention this article gets (or any TOS article, for that matter), I think there might be a problem with the current version. I'm not going to get into the detail (because I don't understand them, not because I'm holding anything back), but I think that the license of this site is incompatible with that of Wikipedia. If you look through the history of this article you will see that it originally was derived from the Wikipedia entry before being blanked (due to the license issues). --Steelviper 14:59, 31 January 2006 (EST)
A fair enough assessment, I'll blank the thing again and start from scratch. :) Joemc72 15:04, 31 January 2006 (EST)
- Thanks! Hopefully one of our license experts might weigh in (I think Peter Farago usually speaks up about such things). --Steelviper 15:49, 31 January 2006 (EST)