Talk:The Twelve Colonies of Man/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
Discussion page of The Twelve Colonies of Man/Archive 1
More actions
Steelviper (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) Non-canon information |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:If you can find some good canonical references, feel free to hack and slash at this. It's a pretty sad little article for as often it gets linked to. All of the "referenced" information looks ok, but I don't know the source of the colony names for the article. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:19, 26 January 2006 (EST) | :If you can find some good canonical references, feel free to hack and slash at this. It's a pretty sad little article for as often it gets linked to. All of the "referenced" information looks ok, but I don't know the source of the colony names for the article. --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 14:19, 26 January 2006 (EST) | ||
== Non-canon information == | |||
I'm against the referencing of [[The Official Battlestar Galactica Scrapbook]] in this article. The names shown are so clearly off from what is canonical that there is certainly some ancient fanwanking at work. I don't mind moving the reference to the book's article itself, but mixing it here is nothing but trouble. Making the matter worse is that "official" in those days may or may not have been so. We need a source that verifies that source or we need to remove this reference. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 07:52, 23 April 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:52, 23 April 2007
Can it be confirmed that Scorpia's analog is Scorpion? My understanding (and I'm still looking for the info myself) is that it's Scorpinon.--Mitsukai 13:52, 26 January 2006 (EST)
- If you can find some good canonical references, feel free to hack and slash at this. It's a pretty sad little article for as often it gets linked to. All of the "referenced" information looks ok, but I don't know the source of the colony names for the article. --Steelviper 14:19, 26 January 2006 (EST)
Non-canon information
I'm against the referencing of The Official Battlestar Galactica Scrapbook in this article. The names shown are so clearly off from what is canonical that there is certainly some ancient fanwanking at work. I don't mind moving the reference to the book's article itself, but mixing it here is nothing but trouble. Making the matter worse is that "official" in those days may or may not have been so. We need a source that verifies that source or we need to remove this reference. --Spencerian 07:52, 23 April 2007 (CDT)