More actions
Spencerian (talk | contribs) Delete Candidate |
Steelviper (talk | contribs) agree |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is more navel lint. This article seems quite unnecessary since we haven't a known measurement scheme. Also, articles that explain the obvious--like Joe's example, "Phones", don't belong. I'm marking this as a candidate for deletion after about a week or two from debate or consensus, whichever comes first. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:55, 5 January 2006 (EST) | This is more navel lint. This article seems quite unnecessary since we haven't a known measurement scheme. Also, articles that explain the obvious--like Joe's example, "Phones", don't belong. I'm marking this as a candidate for deletion after about a week or two from debate or consensus, whichever comes first. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 10:55, 5 January 2006 (EST) | ||
:It'd have more to stand of if it was linked to. As it stands, it's pretty much an orphan (in addition to being an article explaining the obvious). It should probably go the way of military saluting (the page, not the hand salute). --[[User:Steelviper|Steelviper]] 11:08, 5 January 2006 (EST) |
Revision as of 16:08, 5 January 2006
Delete Candidate
This is more navel lint. This article seems quite unnecessary since we haven't a known measurement scheme. Also, articles that explain the obvious--like Joe's example, "Phones", don't belong. I'm marking this as a candidate for deletion after about a week or two from debate or consensus, whichever comes first. --Spencerian 10:55, 5 January 2006 (EST)
- It'd have more to stand of if it was linked to. As it stands, it's pretty much an orphan (in addition to being an article explaining the obvious). It should probably go the way of military saluting (the page, not the hand salute). --Steelviper 11:08, 5 January 2006 (EST)