Talk:Baah Pakal/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 21:29, 25 September 2005

CLosed cationing said it was the Baah Pakal (Pahkal?). I'm not sure on the spelling of the second part if the h is there or not, but I'm sure on the separation of the words. -- YeNguyen, 24 Sept 2005, 10:21

Any way to know for sure before we move the page? --Peter Farago 17:29, 25 September 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 21:20, 25 September 2005 view source Yenguyen (talk \| contribs) 141 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Revision as of 21:29, 25 September 2005 view source April Arcus (talk \| contribs) Chiefs 8,475 edits No edit summary Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	CLosed cationing said it was the Baah Pakal (Pahkal?). I'm not sure on the spelling of the second part if the h is there or not, but I'm sure on the separation of the words. -- [[User:YeNguyen\|YeNguyen]], 24 Sept 2005, 10:21		CLosed cationing said it was the Baah Pakal (Pahkal?). I'm not sure on the spelling of the second part if the h is there or not, but I'm sure on the separation of the words. -- [[User:YeNguyen\|YeNguyen]], 24 Sept 2005, 10:21

			:Any way to know for sure before we move the page? --[[User:Peter Farago\|Peter Farago]] 17:29, 25 September 2005 (EDT)