Talk:Unnamed characters (RDM)/Archive 1: Difference between revisions
More actions
+ thoughts on article scope |
|||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:I think we should stick to characters with some significance. The Situation Room officers are already pushing it.--[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:50, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | :I think we should stick to characters with some significance. The Situation Room officers are already pushing it.--[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 10:50, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
::We could do what [[MemoryAlpha:Memory Alpha:About|Memory Alpha]] does with [[MemoryAlpha:Unnamed people|unnamed people]] as [[MemoryAlpha:Unnamed Starfleet personnel|Unnamed Starfleet personnel]] or [[MemoryAlpha:Unnamed Andorians|Unnamed Andorians]]. [[User:DrWho42|DrWho42]] 12:24, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | ::We could do what [[MemoryAlpha:Memory Alpha:About|Memory Alpha]] does with [[MemoryAlpha:Unnamed people|unnamed people]] as [[MemoryAlpha:Unnamed Starfleet personnel|Unnamed Starfleet personnel]] or [[MemoryAlpha:Unnamed Andorians|Unnamed Andorians]]. [[User:DrWho42|DrWho42]] 12:24, 23 October 2007 (CDT) | ||
== Thoughts == | |||
We should stick to characters who are credited (or can be credited), or have some supreme significance. Thoughts? -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support|Donate]] - [http://www.sanctuarywiki.org Sanctuary Wiki — ''New'']</sup> 23:28, 23 November 2007 (CST) | |||
Revision as of 05:28, 24 November 2007
Rename List of pilots to List of crew and merge this into it? --Mercifull (Talk/Contribs) 09:29, 13 December 2006 (CST)
- It might deserve its own article if it contains enough people. But it should be renamed "unnamed Battlestar Galactica characters", since "personell" implies that the "BSG" refers to the ship instead of the show --Serenity 09:31, 13 December 2006 (CST)
- It is referring to the ship. I modelled it after the Memory Alpha article "Unnamed USS Enterprise personnel" [1], because I thought that if we list all the unnamed characters in one article it might be too long. But you're right, for now maybe it's best to have all unnamed characters in one article. Ausir 09:36, 13 December 2006 (CST)
- But it should refer to the show IMO since there might also be unnamed characters on other ships. With Pegasus gone I can't think of any at the moment, but it's a possibility. And I don't think the list would get too long, as we don't want to list all one-shot characters, but only recurring ones. There aren't a few dozen, are there? --Serenity 09:43, 13 December 2006 (CST)
- True, especially that, unlike in Star Trek, here Brad often gives us names of minor characters, so they might often get removed from this list. OK, rename it then. Ausir 09:48, 13 December 2006 (CST)
I think that we should list all characters with speaking lines here (also the one-shot ones) and all the recurring extras, especially for Galactica and Pegasus crew. Ausir 10:00, 13 December 2006 (CST)
I went ahead and added the Unnamed Pegasus XO to the list. Although he doesn't have any speaking parts, and isn't even seen, he plays an important part in the plot of Pegasus, and he was a high ranking officer.Mastrchf91 18:49, 30 January 2007 (CST)
I made an incomplete list of other characters, but would the inclusion of these people would be appropriate? DrWho42 10:46, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
- I think we should stick to characters with some significance. The Situation Room officers are already pushing it.--Serenity 10:50, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
- We could do what Memory Alpha does with unnamed people as Unnamed Starfleet personnel or Unnamed Andorians. DrWho42 12:24, 23 October 2007 (CDT)
Thoughts
We should stick to characters who are credited (or can be credited), or have some supreme significance. Thoughts? -- Joe Beaudoin So say we all - Donate - Sanctuary Wiki — New 23:28, 23 November 2007 (CST)