No edit summary |
JubalHarshaw (talk | contribs) my "professional opinion"? LOL |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
Is it just me or are the feats ascribes to the glare way over the top? I think its effects should be describes more subtle. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:04, 1 July 2007 (CDT) | Is it just me or are the feats ascribes to the glare way over the top? I think its effects should be describes more subtle. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 05:04, 1 July 2007 (CDT) | ||
: LOL at my "professional opinion" ... but the glare is definitely worthy of a Silly page. The feats being over the top works, I think. Though a little subtlety is always a good addition, the best Silly pages seem to be a mixture of both. [[User:JubalHarshaw|JubalHarshaw]] 07:02, 3 July 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 12:02, 3 July 2007
Looking good
This article looks good, though it could use a picture. Also, I'm not sure about the real-world Chuck Norris reference. JubalHarshaw, could you give your professional opinion on this one? --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 03:19, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
- The Chuck Norris reference should go. Maybe replace it with something like "Even Colonel Tigh and Doctor Cottle regularly lose against Adama's glare". Those two have some intense glaring and frowning going on themselves. --Serenity 05:41, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
- Good suggestion. --Catrope(Talk to me or e-mail me) 05:45, 30 June 2007 (CDT)
Is it just me or are the feats ascribes to the glare way over the top? I think its effects should be describes more subtle. --Serenity 05:04, 1 July 2007 (CDT)
- LOL at my "professional opinion" ... but the glare is definitely worthy of a Silly page. The feats being over the top works, I think. Though a little subtlety is always a good addition, the best Silly pages seem to be a mixture of both. JubalHarshaw 07:02, 3 July 2007 (CDT)