Battlestar Wiki:Quality Articles/Rapture: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 11:24, 18 May 2007

This discussion is about Rapture's proposed Quality Article status.
This discussion is being used to help the Rapture article achieve quality.

Summary

Insert summary here...

Suggestions

From Battlestar Wiki talk:Quality Articles:

Rapture guide is pretty good. If it was fixed up a little bit more... i think we be golden for an FA status. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 12:38, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

Mhh, yes. That one looks good. Maybe if we find some official statements and a bit more noteworthy dialogue (just a few items. Some pages tend to go overboard with it). --Serenity 12:41, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

I'll try to pull something appropriate out of the podcast for an official statement or two. --Steelviper 13:27, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

How are we doing? More statements or dialogue needed? --Steelviper 15:20, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

We don't typically have many screencaps in episode summaries, but this one could stand a couple: One of the Eye's nova over the Temple, and maybe one of Three approaching the Eye vision system. Also, does the production picture a good thing to have, since the stand-ins are still a bit of a distraction based on what we know now? --Spencerian 15:24, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

Actually on the TOS episode summaries you'll notice that a lot of them do have an extra screencap or so sprinkled about midway through to help break up the text and illustrate another memorable moment. I was just thinking the same thing about that production photo... but being as the vision is likely a highly subjective experience (and could be, for all we know, just a massive hallucination), as well as the fact that it's a really compelling image... I wouldn't have a problem with keeping it. Unless a suitably powerful replacement could be found. --Steelviper 15:50, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

The summary for the Teaser needs to be added and the questions also need to be more consise. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 20:11, 17 May 2007 (CDT)

I'll take a stab at deleting some questions. People often tend to add too much there. --Serenity 06:09, 18 May 2007 (CDT)

Actually, the teaser is there. It's called Act 1 in the summary. Though that item about the standoff with Lee and Anders actually belongs there as well. --Serenity 06:24, 18 May 2007 (CDT)

@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 ::The summary for the Teaser needs to be added and the questions also need to be more consise. [[User:Shane|Shane]] <sup>([[User_Talk:Shane|T]] - [[Special:Contributions/Shane|C]] - [[Special:Editcount/Shane|E]])</sup> 20:11, 17 May 2007 (CDT)
 :::I'll take a stab at deleting some questions. People often tend to add too much there. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:09, 18 May 2007 (CDT)
+:::Actually, the teaser is there. It's called Act 1 in the summary. Though that item about the standoff with Lee and Anders actually belongs there as well. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 06:24, 18 May 2007 (CDT)