More actions
No edit summary |
Spencerian (talk | contribs) →Name Gleaning: +comment |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
The rending is hard, but magnification was sufficient to get one of two names there. Sadly, the second, which could be "Magnus" for all I know, is too covered to even guess at. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:36, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | The rending is hard, but magnification was sufficient to get one of two names there. Sadly, the second, which could be "Magnus" for all I know, is too covered to even guess at. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:36, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
:It's a weird name. I could understand night/instrument flight qualification (which doesn't make sense in this context) but as a ship name it sounds strange. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 14:44, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | :It's a weird name. I could understand night/instrument flight qualification (which doesn't make sense in this context) but as a ship name it sounds strange. --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 14:44, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | ||
::It's a common American alliterative (see [[w:Night Flight|Wikipedia's disambig]]). Personally I find the ship's name less strange than ''[[Embla Brokk]]'' and the dreaded ''[[Faru Sadin]]''. --[[User:Spencerian|Spencerian]] 14:50, 9 May 2007 (CDT) | |||
Revision as of 19:50, 9 May 2007
Name Gleaning
The rending is hard, but magnification was sufficient to get one of two names there. Sadly, the second, which could be "Magnus" for all I know, is too covered to even guess at. --Spencerian 14:36, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
- It's a weird name. I could understand night/instrument flight qualification (which doesn't make sense in this context) but as a ship name it sounds strange. --Serenity 14:44, 9 May 2007 (CDT)
- It's a common American alliterative (see Wikipedia's disambig). Personally I find the ship's name less strange than Embla Brokk and the dreaded Faru Sadin. --Spencerian 14:50, 9 May 2007 (CDT)