Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for May 2007

Cylon Centurion

• Neutral - I'd prefer this article over Cylons (RDM) ... great related imagery section, detailed analysis, I like it. JubalHarshaw 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
• Neutral - Agree with Jubal. --BklynBruzer 20:25, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Cylons (RDM)

• Neutral - Not that it isn't a good article, it's just that something strikes me wrong about it. It's almost poetry more than an encyclopedia article. Not that that is bad. Just ... non-FA, IMHO. JubalHarshaw 15:14, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
• Oppose I don't know. It feels more like a better disambiguation than an article in its own right --Serenity 15:20, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Comment: Aw, and I thought my recent changes with the dual pictures of Six and a bullethead were just witty. :) Still, from an information perspective, I guess I can understand. It's not like we're sensationalism over substance like CNN or something. :P --Spencerian 15:30, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Don't get me wrong, Spencerian ... I like it, it's clean, simple, gets the job done. It's a great one sheet intro to the Cylons! I have changed my vote to Neutral. :) JubalHarshaw 18:57, 10 April 2007 (CDT)

Yeah, it's good for its purpose, but it's not really outstanding either in the grand scheme of things --Serenity 08:40, 11 April 2007 (CDT)

Battle of New Caprica

• Support - Hmm, yes. Great images, detail, writing. JubalHarshaw 19:18, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
• Support - Knowing my record, right after I record this vote someone will nominate something even better. --BklynBruzer 20:25, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
• Support - Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 21:43, 10 April 2007 (CDT)
• Support, super.. some of the images need "upgrading" to HDTV though. MatthewFenton 09:30, 11 April 2007 (CDT)