Battlestar Wiki:Featured articles/Debate for March 2007: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 23:13, 19 February 2007

Tom Zarek

Support I nominated an actual serious article for once! --BklynBruzer 21:26, 9 February 2007 (CST)
Support --Serenity 15:13, 19 February 2007 (CST)

List of pilots

Support A very good "list" on the pilots. Shane ^{(T - C - E)} 09:03, 14 February 2007 (CST)

Oppose My very first article, so I would be flattered, but I think it's a little dull content-wise. --Peter Farago 15:02, 19 February 2007 (CST)
Oppose It's alright, but just a list --Serenity 15:13, 19 February 2007 (CST)

The Battlestar Galactica Drinking Game

Oppose. Silly pages should not be eligable for Featured Article status. --Peter Farago 15:02, 19 February 2007 (CST)
Oppose For the above reason --Serenity 15:13, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Comment Care to supply some reasoning? --BklynBruzer 17:13, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Audrey Landers

Support Too overloaded with cites for my taste, but if one considers that to be important, this one is very good. Also tons of content otherwise --Serenity 15:13, 19 February 2007 (CST)

Comment Overloaded with cites? Blasphemy! --Peter Farago 15:37, 19 February 2007 (CST)

@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
 {{Oppose}}. Silly pages should not be eligable for Featured Article status. --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:02, 19 February 2007 (CST)<br/>
 {{Oppose}} For the above reason --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 19 February 2007 (CST)<br/>
+:{{Comment}} Care to supply some reasoning? --[[User:BklynBruzer|BklynBruzer]] 17:13, 19 February 2007 (CST)
 ==[[Audrey Landers]]==
 {{Support}} Too overloaded with cites for my taste, but if one considers that to be important, this one is very good. Also tons of content otherwise --[[User:Serenity|Serenity]] 15:13, 19 February 2007 (CST)
 :{{Comment}} Overloaded with cites? Blasphemy! --[[User:Peter Farago|Peter Farago]] 15:37, 19 February 2007 (CST)