Talk:Battlestar Galactica: Zarek 1/Archive 1: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 01:11, 6 February 2007

Canon?

While I may be a minority on this, but wouldn't this comic be canon unlike the other Dynamite Series? It covers events referenced in the series proper, and may be meant as a canonal backstory for this semi-regular character. Does anyone else agree?--Deepbluesky 18:49, 5 February 2007 (CST)

Unless RDM says otherwise, the comic books and other fiction works aren't canon. -- Joe Beaudoin ^{So say we all - Donate} 19:11, 5 February 2007 (CST)

Revision as of 00:51, 6 February 2007 view source Deepbluesky (talk \| contribs) 3 edits mNo edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 01:11, 6 February 2007 view source Joe Beaudoin Jr. (talk \| contribs) Senior Chiefs, Marines, Interface administrators, interwiki, Sponsors, CAP, Chiefs 62,801 edits →‎Canon?: reply
Line 2:		Line 2:

	While I may be a minority on this, but wouldn't this comic be canon unlike the other Dynamite Series? It covers events referenced in the series proper, and may be meant as a canonal backstory for this semi-regular character. Does anyone else agree?--[[User:Deepbluesky\|Deepbluesky]] 18:49, 5 February 2007 (CST)		While I may be a minority on this, but wouldn't this comic be canon unlike the other Dynamite Series? It covers events referenced in the series proper, and may be meant as a canonal backstory for this semi-regular character. Does anyone else agree?--[[User:Deepbluesky\|Deepbluesky]] 18:49, 5 February 2007 (CST)
			: Unless RDM says otherwise, the comic books and other fiction works aren't [[canon]]. -- [[User:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|Joe Beaudoin]] <sup>[[User talk:Joe Beaudoin Jr.\|So say we all]] - [[Battlestar Wiki:Site support\|Donate]]</sup> 19:11, 5 February 2007 (CST)